I reported that Feedster’s performance had suddenly improved yesterday. [here]
In the aggregated graph, the classic “runaway CPU/memory leak…OOPS!…REBOOT!” performance pattern appears.
Is anyone at Feedster willing to go on the record about this, just for the education of the group?
Technorati: Feedster, Web Performance
IceRocket: Feedster, Web Performance
2005-07-20 — 11:18
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.technorati.com/search/www.kbcafe.com
No tag
No tag
Multiple tag
Multiple tag
2005-07-20 — 11:18
Even their HTML is broken
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.technorati.com/search/www.kbcafe.com
No tag
No tag
Multiple tag
Multiple tag
2005-07-20 — 11:30
Oops, your editor ate my tags. Retry.
No <html> tag
No <head> tag
Multiple </head> tag
Multiple <body> tag
2005-07-20 — 13:38
Glad that the fixes we’ve been implementing have been working out, and you can see the empirical improvement.
As for the broken HTML, thanks for reporting the bug! It was a glitch in our last site rollout, and we’re going to fix it ASAP.
Dave
2005-07-20 — 15:39
I believe that the HTML validity issue is now fixed. Thanks for pointing it out!
Dave
2005-07-20 — 15:48
Randy,
Thanks very much for the heads up. That was a *very* recent regression (you guys are on the ball!), and thanks to your report has now been fixed.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.technorati.com/search/www.kbcafe.com
Tantek
2005-07-20 — 11:30
No html tagNo head tagMultiple /head tagMultiple body tag
2005-07-20 — 13:38
As for the broken HTML, thanks for reporting the bug! It was a glitch in our last site rollout, and we’re going to fix it ASAP.Dave
2005-07-20 — 15:39
Dave
2005-07-20 — 15:48
Thanks very much for the heads up. That was a *very* recent regression (you guys are on the ball!), and thanks to your report has now been fixed.http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.technorati.com/search/www.kbcafe.comTantek