Category: Life

Get this book…if you can

If you want erudite and reasoned analysis of the roots of the current state if US foreign policy, Gwynne Dyer’s Future: Tense would be the book for you. [Funny, Amazon doesn’t seem to carry it.]

It plots the course and rationale for the neo-conservative revolution and its primary objectives: a Pax Americana enforced by special forces and weapons of high technology, and the diminishment (or dissolution) of the UN.

The book makes a strong case that this undertaking will lead to a multi-polar world, with regional blocs of economic-military alliance banded together to mutually defend each other. He draws comparisons to the world prior to the First World War and the spheres of influence in Goerge Orwell’s 1984.

Yummy good read.


May 22: Hmmm, the ideas in the book are pretty much spot on. Not bad for 18 years ago. All he missed was the climate crisis and the water wars.

Blogger Jobs and the daily rant

The New Blogger Jobs is up. And Amazon is hiring.

Too bad Amazon isn’t looking for Web performance gurus. They are a great company and I tried to get in there for a long time, but gave up.

My problem is that I am a Web performance generalist and evangelist. No one wants vague job titles. They want 10 years of experience in analyzing Web performance data with 20 years of Web development and 30 years of SQL expertise.

I have three skills that I value and find far more interesting than hard qualifications: intelligence, the ability to listen and a weird non-linear way of looking at the world.

So, what am I looking for? Last month, I issued a challenge to the world to challenge me. That is what I am seeking — an organization that will let me carve a clear and recognized path through the morass of Web performance without being restricted by a marketing “vision” or a value proposition.

An organization that will allow me to help a company like Amazon understand why they are all over the news these days, and help them make that issue disappear. Amazon and their peers are great companies that do not need to have their very limited, but very public, Web performance glitches leveraged into marketing fodder.

I will still buy from Amazon; but I want to make them better. I would love to be a part of an organization that wants to HELP companies like Amazon stay on top in e-business and drive Web performance to new levels, not quarterly targets.

So, what does that mean? It means that I want to be a part of an organization that inspires me. And what inspires me?

  1. Clear corporate vision
  2. Profitability and a dedication to research
  3. A willingness to develop a Web performance evangelism team
  4. A holistic view of Web performance and its technology and business repercussions
  5. Having a platform to discuss Web performance with my peers who think about this every day.

Do you have it? Are you an Amazon? Are you better? Do you understand that being ok is not enough? SHow me your passion. Convince me that there are really people who think that Web performance will make or break companies.

Benefit of a Short Attention Span

I was sitting at my desk, consuming my second cup of Desktop Espresso and trying to get jacked up for the day, when I realized that I had no interest in US politics anymore.

This is a good thing.

My attention spand is one that is intensive, but very short. Samantha and I used to describe one of our dogs as having a “slide-show” mind: it could only hold one thought and it filled the entire screen when it was there. “Sleep under tree…<click>…be good dog…<click>…sit…<click>…squirrel”.

I work on that principle. In the run-up to the November 2 vote, I threw myself into reading as much as I could on the campaign and the potential results. Now, I don’t care. I have seen this bad movie before: Nixon’s Second Term. Time to move on.

Now I am throwing myself back into the world of Web performance, as seen by many of the posts from the last few days. I am trying to elevate myself above the day-to-day trivialities of working as a consultant (pipeline of new business, response to tactical questions from customers and prospects, etc) to concentrate on the bigger picture.

And next week, who knows. I will keep you posted.

Right now, I, Samantha and the boys are concentrating on getting better; we have this vicious cold that will not die. Samantha says its the season; I place tha blame on an inter-species virus that came from the Damnation Hound. She had kennel cough when she arrived, and I firmly believe in the sci-fi idea that she transferred it to us.

But she is so cute for a beast from the 9th Level.

Was I talking about something when I started writing this? I don’t remember…

Hey! Do you smell hypocrisy?

Link: The Volokh Conspiracy – Colin Powell condemns Ukraine election:.

The man says:

We cannot accept this result as legitimate because it does not meet international standards and because there has not been an investigation of the numerous and credible reports of fraud and abuse. We have been following developments very closely and are deeply disturbed by the extensive and credible reports of fraud in the election. We call for a full review of the conduct of the election and the tallying of election results.**

Where was he three weeks ago?

The Myth of the American Free Press

In an article posted on TomDispatch, Michael Massing discusses the impotence of the US Media in covering the conflict in Iraq. It is a good solid read, and should not come as a surprise to anyone who has been closely following the war in the “liberal” media.

The problem that this story highlights is that of the increasing lack of editorial control held by reporters themselves. The traditional view of the media has been one of an activist reporter selling a story on its merits to an editorial group. This group grasps that the sources are good and the story is important, and runs with it, damn the fallout.

Today, it is naive to hold that view of the media. For the Wal-Mart generation, news is only good and worthy if it:

  • Involves superstars
  • Embarasses and/or humiliates a person
  • Is a morality play
  • Shows the superiority of the American way of life

The lip service paid to the “free press” is becoming a worldwide laughingstock. Aljazeera and Alarabiya, the upstart Arabic news networks sneered at by the US Government and the mainstream media, provide more in-depth coverage of the conflict than the entire Baghdad press corps combined.

This extends to the homefront as well. The lack of critical coverage of the real reason the 9/11 Intelligence Reform bill died (it was killed by Rumsfeld and the Bush Cabal as a result of neglect) shocked me. Why would a bill that is so widely supported be killed?

This act did serve a political purpose, namely allowing the White House to tag the current session as lame duck, and allowing them to spin this bill (that they don’t want anyway) out into a session of Congress that they have more direct control over. But has this been covered or touched on in the mainstream media?

In its history, I would argue that only for the period from 1960-1980 was there any semblance of a free press in the United States. The humbling of Vietnam and Watergate, the Civil Rights battle, and the Iranian Hostage Crisis were the primary highlights of this period. These all served as embarassments to the United States, and helped galvanize and mobilize what is now termed the neo-conservative movement.

The shrieking, jingoistic, neo-conservative outsider of 1980 has become the rational, experienced commentator of 2004. Tempered by the humiliation of the free press, the neo-cons used their superior morality and deep pockets to create (by purchase or bullying) a media that would present the United States to the world as a simplified version of its own myth. The neo-con media agenda feeds a patriotic highlight film, not a critical analysis of American policy, foreign and domestic.

As was often argued on the campaign trail, John Kerry’s message was one that many Americans found complex, lumbering and tempered by the shades of grey found so often in the real world. The media, wrapped up in its new mandate to deliver news as quickly as possible, has lost the ability to delve into the subtlety necessary to handle complex issues. They want the instant gratification that comes with quick-change, sound-bite, easy-think MTV generation.

The coverage of the conflict in Iraq is a symbol for the decline of the American mainstream media. Television news is no better than the entertainment programs that bracket it. And when someone does question the coverage that they see, their patriotism is questioned.

Questioning the media — and the President — is succinctly summed up by Theodore Roosevelt.

“The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else.”

Bill Moyers — Democracy in the Balance

This article is a must read. It is a view of America, still framed in a christian context, but using the concepts of inclusion, not exclusion.

It is hard for me to look upon the neo-con, “Right-Wing” Christians (I use the capital letter purposefully — look for the to follow the word shortly) and place them in a christian context. They preach hate, disrespect, disregard and exlusion to their followers. It is as though christianity has been divided again, into those who deeply understand the word of Christ, and those who nominally use the word of Christ to divide a nation in their image.

Evangelical Christianity is a sham. It is a disgusting way for the nation to drive the United States back into the 18th century, where freedom was a measured thing, only available to the “right” people.

Link: Democracy in the Balance, Sojourners Magazine/August 2004.

But America is a broken promise, and we are called to do what
we can to fix it – to get America back on the track. St.
Augustine shows us how: “One loving soul sets another on
fire.” But to move beyond sentimentality, what begins in
love must lead on to justice. We are called to the fight of our
lives.

The November 3 Theses

November 3rd Theses


“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”
– Benjamin Franklin

I.
The 2004 presidential election was lost not by John Kerry over the last several months but by the Democratic Party over the last several decades. Democrats have lost control of all three branches of government for the foreseeable future. We are now a minority party.

II.
When the Senate Democratic leader is defeated while spending $16 million attempting to get the majority of 500,000 votes, the problem is not a lack of funding or effort.

III.
The failure of the Democratic Party to connect with Americas desire for fulfillment is political death.

IV.
Democrats are now history’s spectators, Republicans its actors.

V.
The obsession with denouncing the radical conservative project as a “lie” has become a useful substitute for vision.

VI.
Renovating Democratic politics is not a question of moving to the right or talking more about religion. It is about creating a framework that once again communicates to the core needs of the American people.

VII.
America is not now, and never was, simply “the economy, stupid.” What the American people want is a deeper sense of personal meaning, a national mission, and passion in times of fear.

VIII.
Returning the Democratic Party to majority status will require a political realignment no less sweeping than that which was accomplished by conservatives over the last 40 years.

IX.
Only the breath of a serious and new moral-intellectual vision will be sufficient to resuscitate the Democratic Party.

X.
Democratic candidates will continue to lose as long as they treat Americans as rational actors who vote their “self-interest” after weighing competing offers for health care, jobs, and security.

XI.
Conservatives have spent the last 40 years getting clear about the values they represent. They have even developed a “family values” brand to represent a framework that coheres traditional prejudices around prayer in school, gun rights, restricting abortion, and restricting gay rights.

XII.
By contrast, liberal or ‘progressive’ groups and Democrats have spent the same period of time defining themselves against conservative values, even ‘morality’ in general.

XIII.
If resources continue to flow to the same leaders who have failed to construct a new vision and have thus left the Democratic Party in ruins then we can expect more of the same. And worse.

XIV.
Those who resist the process to create a new vision will be left behind.

XV.
Candidates who intend to win should no longer hire consultants who repeatedly lose. Those who counsel caution when dealing with the indifferent, the disaffected, and the undecided do not understand American history. Consultants who advise their clients against offering a clear and compelling vision in fear that it will be attacked should find themselves without a home in the Democratic Party. The sooner they retire, the better.

XVI.
Unconnected at a values level, the Democratic Party’s laundry list of policy proposals is a confusing and alienating hodgepodge of special interests bound together by a vague sense that ‘we’re all on the same side.’ Such a conflation demands no critical self-examination of the interest groups whose turf, and very identities, are treated as inviolable by Party chieftains.

XVII.
The progressive vision must be a direct challenge to fundamentalism in all of its forms: political, religious and economic. It must match fundamentalism’s power without replicating its authoritarianism. It must appeal to the values of liberty, equality, community, justice, unconditional love, shared prosperity, and ecological restoration, among many others.

XVIII.
Democrats serious about returning to majority status must:

  • Retire any leader who believes that we are currently on a winning path that simply needs more money and effort.
  • Define and articulate a coherent set of values of our base, and be willing to lose those allies who do not share these values.
  • Fight battles, win or lose, that define and advance our values and expand our political base.

XIX.
In despair and defeat lie the seeds of triumph and victory. In that loss lies the opportunity to define a new progressive politics for the new century.

David Suzuki on the US

Link: Suzuki on anti-Americanism.

Gotta like the man’s attitude…and opinion. David Suzuki and I have not see eye-to-eye on everything (we had a minor spat in the letters section of th Vancouver Sun in 1998 over urban development), but I think he nails this one.

His summary quote:

Pundits who insist that critics of President Bush are anti-American are really saying that if 52 per cent of Americans believe anything then thats what America stands for and everyone else has to respect that. This is a morally relativistic viewpoint that doesnt even withstand the most basic of scrutiny and Bush administration critics should not be bullied into believing it does.

Copyright © 2024 Performance Zen

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑